<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenSolaris 2009.06 screenshots</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techonia.com/opensolaris-2009-06-screenshots/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techonia.com/opensolaris-2009-06-screenshots</link>
	<description>Technology News, Tutorials and How-tos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisias</title>
		<link>http://www.techonia.com/opensolaris-2009-06-screenshots/comment-page-1#comment-699</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katalis.web.id/?p=83#comment-699</guid>
		<description>Yes.

Unfortunately, ZFS is a memory hog. People says the ideal configuration for heavy disk uses is 8G for a really good reason. :-)

Of course the ZFS is marvelous, and all that memory is put for really good uses (definitively, it&#039;s not a &quot;lazy programming&quot; issue) but in my humble opinion we should be able to choose to use the older UFS.

On a 2G system it could be a better choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, ZFS is a memory hog. People says the ideal configuration for heavy disk uses is 8G for a really good reason. :-)</p>
<p>Of course the ZFS is marvelous, and all that memory is put for really good uses (definitively, it&#8217;s not a &#8220;lazy programming&#8221; issue) but in my humble opinion we should be able to choose to use the older UFS.</p>
<p>On a 2G system it could be a better choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fuad NAHDI</title>
		<link>http://www.techonia.com/opensolaris-2009-06-screenshots/comment-page-1#comment-696</link>
		<dc:creator>Fuad NAHDI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katalis.web.id/?p=83#comment-696</guid>
		<description>Excellent feedback, but it stated that limiting the ARC cache will also limit the amount of cached data that can effect the performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent feedback, but it stated that limiting the ARC cache will also limit the amount of cached data that can effect the performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisias</title>
		<link>http://www.techonia.com/opensolaris-2009-06-screenshots/comment-page-1#comment-693</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 05:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katalis.web.id/?p=83#comment-693</guid>
		<description>Where I wrote &quot;I’m have used&quot;, please read &quot;I have used&quot;.

(Yes, I know - back to that little English grammar I used some years ago)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where I wrote &#8220;I’m have used&#8221;, please read &#8220;I have used&#8221;.</p>
<p>(Yes, I know &#8211; back to that little English grammar I used some years ago)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisias</title>
		<link>http://www.techonia.com/opensolaris-2009-06-screenshots/comment-page-1#comment-692</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 05:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katalis.web.id/?p=83#comment-692</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re not that right about memory management.

I&#039;m have used OpenSolaris Build 134 for some weeks by now, and faced similar situations, but different conclusions.

The OpenSolaris memory consumption is always near 100% because almost every kbyte of unused memory is being used by ZPF to cache disk access. When you start big applications, the system must &quot;clear&quot; the cache memory back to application use, causing some overhead. This is not a problem with 8G RAM systems, but on 4G (or, in my case, a Atom300 with 2G) it is.

Adjust ZFS to be less memory hungry and you&#039;ll face less overhead on application startup - but at cost of more disk access.

See http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Evil_Tuning_Guide#Limiting_the_ARC_Cache for details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re not that right about memory management.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m have used OpenSolaris Build 134 for some weeks by now, and faced similar situations, but different conclusions.</p>
<p>The OpenSolaris memory consumption is always near 100% because almost every kbyte of unused memory is being used by ZPF to cache disk access. When you start big applications, the system must &#8220;clear&#8221; the cache memory back to application use, causing some overhead. This is not a problem with 8G RAM systems, but on 4G (or, in my case, a Atom300 with 2G) it is.</p>
<p>Adjust ZFS to be less memory hungry and you&#8217;ll face less overhead on application startup &#8211; but at cost of more disk access.</p>
<p>See <a href="http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Evil_Tuning_Guide#Limiting_the_ARC_Cache" rel="nofollow">http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Evil_Tuning_Guide#Limiting_the_ARC_Cache</a> for details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Opensolaris 2010.03 Build 133 Screenshot</title>
		<link>http://www.techonia.com/opensolaris-2009-06-screenshots/comment-page-1#comment-560</link>
		<dc:creator>Opensolaris 2010.03 Build 133 Screenshot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 04:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katalis.web.id/?p=83#comment-560</guid>
		<description>[...] The current version of Opensolaris is Opensolaris 2009.06. You can take a look at the screenshots here.  Today I just installed Opensolaris 2010.03 build 133 via Virtualbox on my laptop. Below are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The current version of Opensolaris is Opensolaris 2009.06. You can take a look at the screenshots here.  Today I just installed Opensolaris 2010.03 build 133 via Virtualbox on my laptop. Below are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

